Krishna Guruvayoorappa!
What is revealed in the ongoing ‘Devaprasnam’ in Guruvayoor , is the direct views of Guruvayoorappan . In fact , the `Prasnam' started after duly invoking Bhagavan .
Guruvayoorappan is Maha-Vishnu's Deity Incarnation
Just before Bhagavan Krishna's return to Vaikuntam, He had incarnated as the Deity of Guruvayoorappan, to save His Bhaktas in the tough Kali-Yuga . Guruvayoorappan is a highly interactive Deity ; and is communicating through chosen mediums . We can't find this live phenomenon in any other temple. As instructed by Bhagavan, Adi Shankaracharya had put in place, specific Vedic rituals and regulatory principles for the Temple. Vedic rituals are performed in the purest form here.
Evil Designs to Desecrate the Temple
Unfortunately, in recent times , atheistic Politicians have seized control of the Temple administration and installed their evil comrades in key posts . They decided to change the strict `Kshethra- Aachaaras ` ( sacred Rituals & Practices of the Temple) to loot it's wealth ( second richest in India) . A Temple-Thief desecrates the Deity , before stealing it . However, the renowned Guruvayoor Thanthri ( Temple- Acharya) Raman Namboothirippadu refused to change the ``Kshethra- Aachaaras ` and this infuriated the God-haters . They isolated the revered Thanthri and created several controversies to dethrone him.
Propaganda War against Thanthri
1.Udayasthamana Puja' Changes
Last year, the Devaswom Board decided to change the format of the Main offering "Udayasthamana-Puja " in to a token Pooja ( Collecting money from 10 devotees for a single Item) . Thanthri opposed this evil move but the Board remained adamant . The traditional Temple-staff supported the Thantri and the issue became serious . At last , fearing a rejection by the court , the Board withdrew from the move .
2.Demand for the Entry of Yesudas
K.J. Yesudas , the popular play back singer is a Christian . The question of his temple- entry , had come up in the past too , but then Yesudas refused to give in writing, he has faith in ` Deity worship' and `Kshetra-Aachaaras'. ( Since an undertaking would ex-communicate him from own Christian religion. )
Ignoring the above facts, the fiery Communist Devaswom Minister wrote a public letter to Devaswom President , asking to respectfully invite Yesudas for having darshan inside Guruvaoor Temple . The President , a loyal Communist personally obediently agreed with the Minister and presented the issue in Devaswom director board . But, the Thanthri opposed this anti-Vedic move. And the Devaswom Minister reluctantly withdrew his letter to save face . But he made venomous statements against the Temple's so called "Feudalistic Traditions”, which became the talk of the town.
3. `Punyaham' (Purification ritual) Controversy
Vayalar Ravi , the Central Minister is a Hindu , but his wife is a Christian . A few months back, his son entered Guruvayoor temple to perform, "Choroonu" (First Feeding) ceremony of his child. After this ceremony, a ` Punyaham' was conducted, as recommended by the Thanthri . This was in accordance with the Termple-rules in place (established by Adi Shankaracharya ) .
The revengeful Temple-Reformers, took this opportunity to attack the Thantri and the `Kshetra – Aachaaras' . They unleashed a series of massive agitations ( Guruvayoor Satyagraha – 2 , etc) . Critics led by the abusive Devaswom Minister, self styled "Literary- Legend " Sukumar Azhikkode , and chosen Hindu-Traitors made vulgar speeches against the Thanthri . They claimed that given an opportunity, Guruvayoorappan will kick out the "despot Thanthri " . (Though they claimed to have never worshipped in any temple) .
In order to keep-up the "Secular image" (at the cost of Hinduism as usual) , various Political parties and Social organizations , demanded to amend "Kshetra-Aachaaraas" to permit , entry of Non-Hindus inside Guruvayoor Temple . It was agreed by all these "Secularists” to convene an "Acharya Sabha" (Assembly of Vedic Gurus and Experts) to amend the Guruvayoor `Kshetra-Acharas' , for facilitating entry of Non-Hindus .
Although, the pure Bhakthas loyal to Guruvayoorappan were opposed to such changes, all they could do was to pray for Bhagavan's intervention.
4 . Total Isolation of Gurvayoor Thanthri
Buoyed by the success of their atheistic campaign , the Reformist Devaswom Board Administrators , practically sidelined the Thanthri and started taking decisions at their will.
• The Board President issued a public apology condemning the Thantri's decision to perform "Punyaham " after the temple- entry of Minister's son .
• The Board announced the decision to amend the existing dress codes . Women will be allowed to enter the temple wearing Churidar . ( They forcefully grabbed it's consent from the Thanthri ) .
• The Board announced that , they are in agreement to permit the entry of Non-Hindus in the temple . Also , as part of their policy " Manava Seva is Madhava Seva " , they intend to spend Devaswam Funds to develop "Facilities" outside the Temple . And, they will arrange a "Devaprasnam " to obtain Deity's permission for the proposed Amendments and New Schemes . (A clever move to overrule the Thanthri so as to go ahead with their Evil plans ) .
Guruvayoorappan's Divine INSTRUCTIONS ( Revealed in Devaprasnam )
1. No change to the `Kshetra-Aachaaraas' . No entry to Non-Hindus . No Change to the Dress Codes . No Authority will Change the Aachaaraas.
2. Thanthri must be allowed to perform His duties freely . His recommendations must be implemented promptly .
3. Devawom Board’s Top men including Directors, Officials and Staff are Corrupt and Sinners. Bhagavan will crush the Culprits.
4. Bhagavan doesn't want any inconvenience to His Bhaktas . Cost of Offerings must be reduced to Help His Bhaktas . Devaswom Shelters must be constructed to accommodate Old and Orphan Bhakthas .
5. Daily Income & Expense of the Temple must be read out to Bhagavan , prior to closure of Temple . Bhagavan is furious at the efforts to cheat Him .
Om Namo Narayanaya
Monday, November 05, 2007
Sunday, September 02, 2007
Manca 2007 Onam Celebrations
Manca 2007 Events
Maalu's Dance
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rrOxey1ney
Kai Kotti Kali
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ucU2aoUPxRg
Maalu's Dance
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rrOxey1ney
Kai Kotti Kali
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ucU2aoUPxRg
Thursday, August 23, 2007
Indian Marxists and their evil designs
By Col (retd) Anil Athale
Karl Marx took a dim view of India and its heritage.
Writing in the New York Tribune dated June 25, 1853 (quoted in Lewis S Feuer edited Marx and Engels Basic Writings, Anchor Books, NY 1959, pp. 474-481) he claimed that the ‘Golden Age’ of India was all myth and India was always a poor starving country. He further went on to admire and appreciate the British for destroying the Indian village industry and economy so that India could ‘modernise’.
But to the Indian communists, the words of Marx are like commandments from God. Their devotion to the dead communism can be seen on the walls of Calcutta, possibly the only city in the world where you can find pictures of Marx, Lenin and Stalin displayed with pride.
Following the footsteps of Marx, the Indian communists have deep hatred of anything Indian and are opponents of any kind of pride in Indian heritage. The communists also hold that India is not one nation but a ‘collection of nationalities’.
Another major tenet of Indian Marxist’s orthodoxy is that for national reconstruction you have to first destroy the existing nation.
The communists have had many ideological splits. Communists in India are splintered into several groupings like the CPI, CPM, CPI (M-L), Maoists and the People’s War Group. But despite several ‘historical blunders’ that they keep committing with regularity, they have all remained steadfast to the twin agenda of weakening and destroying the existing Indian nation and obliterate the ‘bourgeois’ notion of pride in India’s past.
Thus in 1942 the communists not just supported the British but also acted as their stool pigeons. Many underground revolutionaries were betrayed to the British secret police, who went on to hang them. George Orwell has written extensively on this subject and evidence of this is littered in declassified files of British India, now available at India Office Library and Records in London.
Subhas Chandra Bose, who fought for Indian freedom and was no Japanese stooge, was denounced as fascist and vilified by the Marxists. In today’s communist-ruled Bengal, the towering contributions of Swami Vivekananda are a distant memory and sought to be pushed out of public memory. Neither is Aurobindo Ghosh remembered. All the three are inconvenient to Marxist ideology.
The communists began their offensive against India right from the time of Independence. The Telangana armed uprising was a direct challenge to the newly independent nation. Unfortunately for the Marxists, under the efficient and ruthless Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel, the Indian police and armed forces crushed the rebellion with ease. The Naxalite uprising in 1970 met a similar fate.
Most of the time, the communists mask their real agenda under a constant propaganda about their concern for poor. It is another matter that in their disclosure to the election commission most ‘champions of poor’ Communists happen to be millionaires several times over. (The Statesman, April 22, 2004. Somnath Chatterji’s declared assets exceed Rs 5 crore).
The Marxists participate in and use the democratic process but constantly deride Indian democracy vis a vis Chinese one party rule. Marxists wear a mask of nationalism but the mask sometimes slips, as in 1962 during the Chinese attack on India when the Marxists came out openly on the side of the Chinese.
On November 13, 1962 while replying to the discussions in the Rajya Sabha, Lal Bahadur Shastri pointed out that Jyoti Basu equated India with China during the war and called the Chinese aggression as provoked by Indian statements and “across an imaginary line called MacMohan line”. But the Marxists were not merely satisfied with words. Kalimpong town had become a den of Chinese spies. Every move of the Indian army was monitored and reported to the enemy. Like in 1942, the communists played a major role in helping the Chinese.
The long-time ideological opponents of Indian nationalism painted a frightening scenario when India tested nuclear weapons in 1998. They had greeted with a deafening silence each of the 45 declared nuclear tests carried out by China since 1964. How come that throughout this feverish pursuit by China of the means of nuclear deterrence, the Indian communists never showed the slightest anxiety about a possible outbreak of a nuclear war in Asia? The answer lies in their conviction that China's policy stemmed from genuine nationalism as distinguished from India's alleged pseudo-nationalism.
The Chinese ideologues, until now, did not manipulate their admirers in India. This was dictated by Chinese pessimism about the future of the communist movement in India. More relevantly, the Chinese communists did not fail to notice that the CPM and the CPI did not have 10 per cent of the seats in the Parliament in the 13 General Elections held so far. But after the last elections which left a trifurcated verdict, the Marxists have gained a whip hand at the centre.
While it is difficult to reverse the nuclearisation that has taken place in India, the Marxists have found a way out.
The Common Minimum Programme talks about changing the Indo-Israel relations. The allusion is directly to the defence relationship. It is through this that India had been promised the Falcon airborne system that would give India a decided advantage over China and Pakistan in air battles. China too wanted this system but the contract was cancelled under American pressure. Now by downgrading relations with US, the Marxists wish to cripple Indian defence and help China.
In all their plans of spreading communism in India, the Marxists believe that the strong Indian armed forces are the biggest obstacle. Their hatred of the armed forces is seen through many petty acts that the West Bengal government regularly inflicts on the armed forces personnel. Presently the Indian army seems to be getting an upper hand over the Pakistani sponsored terrorists thanks to the infantry equipment and training co-ordination with Israelis. The Marxists hope that severing this link will automatically weaken the armed forces, their biggest adversary.
The Cold War has been over for over a decade now. During that period, Indian and Soviet interests coincided and the two had a quasi-alliance for over 25 years. The Indo-Soviet Friendship treaty of 1971 stood the test of time.
In the new millennium India faces an unstable Pakistan to the west and a rising China that lays claims to the Indian State of Arunachal Pradesh to the north and east. And while Chinese naval expansion proceeds at a hectic pace, Beijing does not miss any opportunity to check/thwart India at all international forums.
The US is concerned over the rise of China and its internal stability. It is interested in ensuring the rise of India to balance China in Asia. The US is also affected by Islamist terrorism and is fearful of Talibanisation of Pakistan.
These basic and fundamental national interests of US and India converge and are likely to remain for most of 21st century. The US-India strategic partnership was hamstrung by the domestic American legislation that denied technology to India due to her non-adherence to NPT. The present nuclear deal (Full Coverage) is an effort to overcome that hurdle and forge a strategic partnership between the two. Technical experts, scientists and bureaucrats have worked for over two years to hammer out a successful treaty.
The Indo-US nuclear deal (Full Coverage) is opposed by Pakistan, China and al Qaeda. It is indeed surprising that some Indian political parties with frozen mindsets, opportunism or ideological anti-national orientation are also opposing this deal. A canard is being spread that an economically powerful and nuclear weapons armed India is thus likely to be subservient to the US. India has withstood its ground in worse times. It appears that these political forces are more concerned about the interest of China rather than their own country.
It is time the Indian citizens raised their voice and nullified the evil designs of parties who had sided with the enemy when our jawans were dying on the Himalayan border in 1962.
About the Author :
Col. (retd) Anil A Athale is a Fellow at the Centre for Armed Forces Historical Research. A former Joint Director (History Division) and infantryman, he has been running an NGO, Peace and Disarmament, based in Pune for the past 10 years. As a military historian he specialises in insurgency and peace process.
Karl Marx took a dim view of India and its heritage.
Writing in the New York Tribune dated June 25, 1853 (quoted in Lewis S Feuer edited Marx and Engels Basic Writings, Anchor Books, NY 1959, pp. 474-481) he claimed that the ‘Golden Age’ of India was all myth and India was always a poor starving country. He further went on to admire and appreciate the British for destroying the Indian village industry and economy so that India could ‘modernise’.
But to the Indian communists, the words of Marx are like commandments from God. Their devotion to the dead communism can be seen on the walls of Calcutta, possibly the only city in the world where you can find pictures of Marx, Lenin and Stalin displayed with pride.
Following the footsteps of Marx, the Indian communists have deep hatred of anything Indian and are opponents of any kind of pride in Indian heritage. The communists also hold that India is not one nation but a ‘collection of nationalities’.
Another major tenet of Indian Marxist’s orthodoxy is that for national reconstruction you have to first destroy the existing nation.
The communists have had many ideological splits. Communists in India are splintered into several groupings like the CPI, CPM, CPI (M-L), Maoists and the People’s War Group. But despite several ‘historical blunders’ that they keep committing with regularity, they have all remained steadfast to the twin agenda of weakening and destroying the existing Indian nation and obliterate the ‘bourgeois’ notion of pride in India’s past.
Thus in 1942 the communists not just supported the British but also acted as their stool pigeons. Many underground revolutionaries were betrayed to the British secret police, who went on to hang them. George Orwell has written extensively on this subject and evidence of this is littered in declassified files of British India, now available at India Office Library and Records in London.
Subhas Chandra Bose, who fought for Indian freedom and was no Japanese stooge, was denounced as fascist and vilified by the Marxists. In today’s communist-ruled Bengal, the towering contributions of Swami Vivekananda are a distant memory and sought to be pushed out of public memory. Neither is Aurobindo Ghosh remembered. All the three are inconvenient to Marxist ideology.
The communists began their offensive against India right from the time of Independence. The Telangana armed uprising was a direct challenge to the newly independent nation. Unfortunately for the Marxists, under the efficient and ruthless Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel, the Indian police and armed forces crushed the rebellion with ease. The Naxalite uprising in 1970 met a similar fate.
Most of the time, the communists mask their real agenda under a constant propaganda about their concern for poor. It is another matter that in their disclosure to the election commission most ‘champions of poor’ Communists happen to be millionaires several times over. (The Statesman, April 22, 2004. Somnath Chatterji’s declared assets exceed Rs 5 crore).
The Marxists participate in and use the democratic process but constantly deride Indian democracy vis a vis Chinese one party rule. Marxists wear a mask of nationalism but the mask sometimes slips, as in 1962 during the Chinese attack on India when the Marxists came out openly on the side of the Chinese.
On November 13, 1962 while replying to the discussions in the Rajya Sabha, Lal Bahadur Shastri pointed out that Jyoti Basu equated India with China during the war and called the Chinese aggression as provoked by Indian statements and “across an imaginary line called MacMohan line”. But the Marxists were not merely satisfied with words. Kalimpong town had become a den of Chinese spies. Every move of the Indian army was monitored and reported to the enemy. Like in 1942, the communists played a major role in helping the Chinese.
The long-time ideological opponents of Indian nationalism painted a frightening scenario when India tested nuclear weapons in 1998. They had greeted with a deafening silence each of the 45 declared nuclear tests carried out by China since 1964. How come that throughout this feverish pursuit by China of the means of nuclear deterrence, the Indian communists never showed the slightest anxiety about a possible outbreak of a nuclear war in Asia? The answer lies in their conviction that China's policy stemmed from genuine nationalism as distinguished from India's alleged pseudo-nationalism.
The Chinese ideologues, until now, did not manipulate their admirers in India. This was dictated by Chinese pessimism about the future of the communist movement in India. More relevantly, the Chinese communists did not fail to notice that the CPM and the CPI did not have 10 per cent of the seats in the Parliament in the 13 General Elections held so far. But after the last elections which left a trifurcated verdict, the Marxists have gained a whip hand at the centre.
While it is difficult to reverse the nuclearisation that has taken place in India, the Marxists have found a way out.
The Common Minimum Programme talks about changing the Indo-Israel relations. The allusion is directly to the defence relationship. It is through this that India had been promised the Falcon airborne system that would give India a decided advantage over China and Pakistan in air battles. China too wanted this system but the contract was cancelled under American pressure. Now by downgrading relations with US, the Marxists wish to cripple Indian defence and help China.
In all their plans of spreading communism in India, the Marxists believe that the strong Indian armed forces are the biggest obstacle. Their hatred of the armed forces is seen through many petty acts that the West Bengal government regularly inflicts on the armed forces personnel. Presently the Indian army seems to be getting an upper hand over the Pakistani sponsored terrorists thanks to the infantry equipment and training co-ordination with Israelis. The Marxists hope that severing this link will automatically weaken the armed forces, their biggest adversary.
The Cold War has been over for over a decade now. During that period, Indian and Soviet interests coincided and the two had a quasi-alliance for over 25 years. The Indo-Soviet Friendship treaty of 1971 stood the test of time.
In the new millennium India faces an unstable Pakistan to the west and a rising China that lays claims to the Indian State of Arunachal Pradesh to the north and east. And while Chinese naval expansion proceeds at a hectic pace, Beijing does not miss any opportunity to check/thwart India at all international forums.
The US is concerned over the rise of China and its internal stability. It is interested in ensuring the rise of India to balance China in Asia. The US is also affected by Islamist terrorism and is fearful of Talibanisation of Pakistan.
These basic and fundamental national interests of US and India converge and are likely to remain for most of 21st century. The US-India strategic partnership was hamstrung by the domestic American legislation that denied technology to India due to her non-adherence to NPT. The present nuclear deal (Full Coverage) is an effort to overcome that hurdle and forge a strategic partnership between the two. Technical experts, scientists and bureaucrats have worked for over two years to hammer out a successful treaty.
The Indo-US nuclear deal (Full Coverage) is opposed by Pakistan, China and al Qaeda. It is indeed surprising that some Indian political parties with frozen mindsets, opportunism or ideological anti-national orientation are also opposing this deal. A canard is being spread that an economically powerful and nuclear weapons armed India is thus likely to be subservient to the US. India has withstood its ground in worse times. It appears that these political forces are more concerned about the interest of China rather than their own country.
It is time the Indian citizens raised their voice and nullified the evil designs of parties who had sided with the enemy when our jawans were dying on the Himalayan border in 1962.
About the Author :
Col. (retd) Anil A Athale is a Fellow at the Centre for Armed Forces Historical Research. A former Joint Director (History Division) and infantryman, he has been running an NGO, Peace and Disarmament, based in Pune for the past 10 years. As a military historian he specialises in insurgency and peace process.
Monday, August 20, 2007
Black Tea and Vada
The neo-liberalists in the CPI(M), led by State secretary Pinarayi Vijayan, might have bid good bye to the era of privatisation, when communists, dreaming of nothing but a classless society and the total power of the proletariat, used to live on black tea, dal vada and beedis. But the faction of hardliners in the party headed by Chief Minister VS Achuthanandan still think that these symbols of frugality are icons to be tattooed on the chests of communists. At least, this is the message the hardliners are trying to convey to the neo-liberalist camp when they serve black tea and vada at party programmes.
CPI(M) central committee member and a trusted lieutenant of Pinarayi Vijayan in the group war EP Jayarajan had some time back commented at a party function that the efforts to build up the party with black coffee, dal vadas and beedis were senseless acts. "There are some people who think that the party could be developed that way. If the party is built up that way, the communist party will not get people to join it," he said.
As this statement gained popularity among the media, Jayarajan naturally began to receive criticisms to the effect that a leader of a proletarian party was speaking like a bourgeois. But he commented that the media was bent on destroying him and his leader Pinarayi and that was why they were reporting his speeches in distorted manner.
As it often happens with him, Jayarajan did not leave the matter there, but took it to the streets once again. On August 15, while inaugurating an Independence Day programme organised by the party's youth wing DYFI in Thrissur, he attacked the media for distorting his comment on black tea and vada. He tried to be a little bit humourous, saying that since his comment, vada's market had gone up. Indeed, certain Comrades on the very same moment were savouring scalding hot black tea and eating chilly-mixed dal vada at the same programme. More than hundred participants had got the treat given by, undoubtedly, those comrades who did not like Jayarajan and his anti-black tea theory.
The black-tea,vada programme has since then spread into other parts of the State with several instances of such treats at party programmes being reported from Palakkad districts in the last one week. Reports also suggest that vada and black tea are hot favourites at party functions in other parts of the State also.
At the same time, VS-loyalists in the party are seeing the comment made by Jayarajan, removed as general manager of party organ Desabhimani for receiving Rs 2 crore slush funds as deposit from lottery king Santiago Martin, as a clear sign of how the neo-liberalists led by Pinarayi Vijayan had adopted a neo-rich culture. "It is true that they-the likes of Jayarajan-don't want to have any part in a movement that is composed of people who smell of sweat.
The economy might have undergone several changes, but the communist party is basically the party of the working masses. Jayarajans will never understand this," fumed a VS-loyalist.
CPI(M) central committee member and a trusted lieutenant of Pinarayi Vijayan in the group war EP Jayarajan had some time back commented at a party function that the efforts to build up the party with black coffee, dal vadas and beedis were senseless acts. "There are some people who think that the party could be developed that way. If the party is built up that way, the communist party will not get people to join it," he said.
As this statement gained popularity among the media, Jayarajan naturally began to receive criticisms to the effect that a leader of a proletarian party was speaking like a bourgeois. But he commented that the media was bent on destroying him and his leader Pinarayi and that was why they were reporting his speeches in distorted manner.
As it often happens with him, Jayarajan did not leave the matter there, but took it to the streets once again. On August 15, while inaugurating an Independence Day programme organised by the party's youth wing DYFI in Thrissur, he attacked the media for distorting his comment on black tea and vada. He tried to be a little bit humourous, saying that since his comment, vada's market had gone up. Indeed, certain Comrades on the very same moment were savouring scalding hot black tea and eating chilly-mixed dal vada at the same programme. More than hundred participants had got the treat given by, undoubtedly, those comrades who did not like Jayarajan and his anti-black tea theory.
The black-tea,vada programme has since then spread into other parts of the State with several instances of such treats at party programmes being reported from Palakkad districts in the last one week. Reports also suggest that vada and black tea are hot favourites at party functions in other parts of the State also.
At the same time, VS-loyalists in the party are seeing the comment made by Jayarajan, removed as general manager of party organ Desabhimani for receiving Rs 2 crore slush funds as deposit from lottery king Santiago Martin, as a clear sign of how the neo-liberalists led by Pinarayi Vijayan had adopted a neo-rich culture. "It is true that they-the likes of Jayarajan-don't want to have any part in a movement that is composed of people who smell of sweat.
The economy might have undergone several changes, but the communist party is basically the party of the working masses. Jayarajans will never understand this," fumed a VS-loyalist.
Wednesday, June 27, 2007
More Heat for Indian Outsourcers
Senators Grassley and Durbin release more data showing that Tata, Infosys, and others are using U.S. work visas to their advantage
As a revamped immigration reform bill heads to the Senate floor this week, opponents of outsourcing are again turning up the heat on companies they say are exploiting U.S. visa programs to send jobs abroad and to hire cheaper, non-American tech workers. On June 26, Senators Dick Durbin (D-Ill.) and Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) released information revealing that foreign outsourcing firms that use the high-skilled H1-B visa program extensively are also among the heaviest users of another category, known as L visas.
Durbin and Grassley say these companies are abusing the L visa program, which is intended to allow multinationals to transfer foreign managers and specialists within a company to U.S. offices. The Senators allege that outsourcing firms are not engaging in transferring at all, but instead are hiring foreign workers expressly to bring them to the U.S.—and to take the place of American workers. The newly released data show that of the top 20 L visa users in fiscal year 2006, 14 are offshore outsourcing firms, including Tata Consultancy Services, Satyam Computer Services (SAY), Wipro (WIT), Infosys Technologies (INFY), Patni Computer Systems (PTI), and Accenture (ACN).
"Clear" Evidence
"It's clear that foreign outsourcing firms are abusing the system and we can't let that continue," said Senator Durbin in a statement. Representatives of Tata, Wipro, Infosys, and other top outsourcing firms could not be reached immediately for comment.
Durbin and Grassley obtained the information on L visa users from the U.S. Bureau of Citizenship & Immigration Services after requesting it in a June 13 letter. The data show, for example, that Mumbai-based Tata Consultancy obtained 4,887 L visas in fiscal year 2006, the most of any firm, American or Indian. "I find it hard to believe that any one company has that many individuals…legitimately being transferred within a single year," said Durbin.
A spokesman for Tata denies any wrongdoing and says that the company is willing to cooperate with Durbin to clear up any misunderstanding. "We're complying with the law and with the regulations," says the spokesman. "We want to work with Congress to address any issues they may have."
The Senators' latest missive comes just over a month after they launched their own investigation into the Indian outsourcers' activities in the U.S. On May 14, Durbin and Grassley sent letters to nine of the outsourcing firms, requesting information about how they use H-1B visas . That program was originally set up so U.S. companies could hire foreign workers with rare skills, but in recent years the most active users of the program have become outsourcing firms, led by Infosys and Wipro. Durbin and Grassley have said that this is evidence the program is being used to outsource American jobs to India.
Furious Reaction
Critics say the L visa program could allow for even more abuse than the H1-B program, which allows high-skilled workers to come to the U.S. for up to six years. While H1-B visas are capped at 65,000 per year, there is no annual limit to the number of L visas, and while H1-B visa workers must receive the prevailing wage, there is no such requirement for L visas. The number of such visas issued has increased from 39,886 in 2001 to 53,144 in 2006.
To address the problem, Durbin and Grassley are proposing an amendment to the revised comprehensive immigration reform bill, expected to reach the Senate floor for debate next week. The amendment calls for a prohibition on using the H1-B and L visas while outsourcing jobs abroad, and it limits a company's total H1-B and L visa use to no more than 50% of its workforce. The amendment also calls for the Labor Dept. to set the prevailing wage for visa workers, instead of employers, requiring employers to demonstrate a failure to hire Americans before being awarded visas. Durbin and Grassley originally tried to include these provisions in another amendment proposed by Senators Maria Cantwell (D-Wash.) and Jon Kyl (R-Ariz.). But ultimately they decided on a separate proposal with what they consider to be more stringent protections for U.S. workers.
The reaction from India has been furious. The Indian outsourcing firms feel they are the victims of political scapegoating and say that what they are doing is helping their American clients to become more competitive. Kamal Nath, India's commerce and industry minister, has said that the two senators are interfering with free trade, since one of India's most important exports is the services of its tech companies
Debate Continues
The Indian firms have also raised questions about whether Durbin and Grassley have any place in the current discussion. They say that the flow of Indian workers into the U.S. is essentially a trade issue and therefore should be negotiated by the Bush Administration under the rubric of the World Trade Organization. In a letter to Durbin and Grassley on May 30, Nasscom, the organization that represents India's software and services companies, pointedly noted that trade between the two countries flows both ways and that India's tech industry buys products from Hewlett-Packard (HPQ), Microsoft (MSFT), Oracle (ORCL), and Dell (DELL)
American tech companies have largely supported the idea of more visas for temporary workers, for themselves and for Indian tech companies. But that may be changing. Microsoft and Oracle have begun to voice support for the effort to reform of the visa system to prevent abuse . Still, Compete America, a coalition of tech companies that includes Microsoft and Oracle, issued a statement June 20 in support of the Cantwell-Kyl bill.
The debate is sure to intensify in the days ahead. On June 26, the Senate took the first step toward reconsideration of the comprehensive immigration bill—taken off the floor for retooling June 7. The senators voted to move forward on bringing the legislation to the Senate floor. There, in the coming days, the battle over the fate of immigrants, high-skilled and not, will be decided.
As a revamped immigration reform bill heads to the Senate floor this week, opponents of outsourcing are again turning up the heat on companies they say are exploiting U.S. visa programs to send jobs abroad and to hire cheaper, non-American tech workers. On June 26, Senators Dick Durbin (D-Ill.) and Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) released information revealing that foreign outsourcing firms that use the high-skilled H1-B visa program extensively are also among the heaviest users of another category, known as L visas.
Durbin and Grassley say these companies are abusing the L visa program, which is intended to allow multinationals to transfer foreign managers and specialists within a company to U.S. offices. The Senators allege that outsourcing firms are not engaging in transferring at all, but instead are hiring foreign workers expressly to bring them to the U.S.—and to take the place of American workers. The newly released data show that of the top 20 L visa users in fiscal year 2006, 14 are offshore outsourcing firms, including Tata Consultancy Services, Satyam Computer Services (SAY), Wipro (WIT), Infosys Technologies (INFY), Patni Computer Systems (PTI), and Accenture (ACN).
"Clear" Evidence
"It's clear that foreign outsourcing firms are abusing the system and we can't let that continue," said Senator Durbin in a statement. Representatives of Tata, Wipro, Infosys, and other top outsourcing firms could not be reached immediately for comment.
Durbin and Grassley obtained the information on L visa users from the U.S. Bureau of Citizenship & Immigration Services after requesting it in a June 13 letter. The data show, for example, that Mumbai-based Tata Consultancy obtained 4,887 L visas in fiscal year 2006, the most of any firm, American or Indian. "I find it hard to believe that any one company has that many individuals…legitimately being transferred within a single year," said Durbin.
A spokesman for Tata denies any wrongdoing and says that the company is willing to cooperate with Durbin to clear up any misunderstanding. "We're complying with the law and with the regulations," says the spokesman. "We want to work with Congress to address any issues they may have."
The Senators' latest missive comes just over a month after they launched their own investigation into the Indian outsourcers' activities in the U.S. On May 14, Durbin and Grassley sent letters to nine of the outsourcing firms, requesting information about how they use H-1B visas . That program was originally set up so U.S. companies could hire foreign workers with rare skills, but in recent years the most active users of the program have become outsourcing firms, led by Infosys and Wipro. Durbin and Grassley have said that this is evidence the program is being used to outsource American jobs to India.
Furious Reaction
Critics say the L visa program could allow for even more abuse than the H1-B program, which allows high-skilled workers to come to the U.S. for up to six years. While H1-B visas are capped at 65,000 per year, there is no annual limit to the number of L visas, and while H1-B visa workers must receive the prevailing wage, there is no such requirement for L visas. The number of such visas issued has increased from 39,886 in 2001 to 53,144 in 2006.
To address the problem, Durbin and Grassley are proposing an amendment to the revised comprehensive immigration reform bill, expected to reach the Senate floor for debate next week. The amendment calls for a prohibition on using the H1-B and L visas while outsourcing jobs abroad, and it limits a company's total H1-B and L visa use to no more than 50% of its workforce. The amendment also calls for the Labor Dept. to set the prevailing wage for visa workers, instead of employers, requiring employers to demonstrate a failure to hire Americans before being awarded visas. Durbin and Grassley originally tried to include these provisions in another amendment proposed by Senators Maria Cantwell (D-Wash.) and Jon Kyl (R-Ariz.). But ultimately they decided on a separate proposal with what they consider to be more stringent protections for U.S. workers.
The reaction from India has been furious. The Indian outsourcing firms feel they are the victims of political scapegoating and say that what they are doing is helping their American clients to become more competitive. Kamal Nath, India's commerce and industry minister, has said that the two senators are interfering with free trade, since one of India's most important exports is the services of its tech companies
Debate Continues
The Indian firms have also raised questions about whether Durbin and Grassley have any place in the current discussion. They say that the flow of Indian workers into the U.S. is essentially a trade issue and therefore should be negotiated by the Bush Administration under the rubric of the World Trade Organization. In a letter to Durbin and Grassley on May 30, Nasscom, the organization that represents India's software and services companies, pointedly noted that trade between the two countries flows both ways and that India's tech industry buys products from Hewlett-Packard (HPQ), Microsoft (MSFT), Oracle (ORCL), and Dell (DELL)
American tech companies have largely supported the idea of more visas for temporary workers, for themselves and for Indian tech companies. But that may be changing. Microsoft and Oracle have begun to voice support for the effort to reform of the visa system to prevent abuse . Still, Compete America, a coalition of tech companies that includes Microsoft and Oracle, issued a statement June 20 in support of the Cantwell-Kyl bill.
The debate is sure to intensify in the days ahead. On June 26, the Senate took the first step toward reconsideration of the comprehensive immigration bill—taken off the floor for retooling June 7. The senators voted to move forward on bringing the legislation to the Senate floor. There, in the coming days, the battle over the fate of immigrants, high-skilled and not, will be decided.
Crackdown on Indian Outsourcing Firms
Two senators are probing how Indian outsourcing firms use U.S. work visas, with an eye on new restrictions.Concerns about foreign companies that benefit from a visa program designed to make the U.S. more competitive are taking center stage in Washington, with two senators demanding explanations from overseas users of the system. Senators Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) and Richard Durbin (D-Ill.) on May 14 sent letters to nine foreign outsourcing companies requesting detailed information on how they use temporary work visas, known as H-1Bs, to bring foreign workers into the U.S.
Critics say outsourcing firms, including Infosys Technologies (INFY) and Wipro (WIT), are using the visas to replace U.S. employees with foreign workers, often cycling overseas staff through U.S. training programs before sending them back into jobs at home. The lawmakers are intent on probing whether those allegations are accurate. "Supporters claim the goal of the H-1B program is to help the American economy by allowing U.S. companies to hire needed foreign workers," Durbin said in a statement. "The reality is that too many H-1B visas are being used to facilitate the outsourcing of American jobs to other countries."
In outlining the investigation, Durbin and Grassley are making details of the visa program public for the first time, including the number of visas awarded to non-U.S. companies. The nine firms, led by Infosys and Wipro, use 19,512 of the H-1B visas, or 30% of the 65,000 visas allowed each year. This indicates that Indian outsourcing companies participate more actively than previously thought, garnering for themselves visas that could otherwise go to U.S. firms. "This is information that we never had before," says Ron Hira, a public policy professor at the Rochester Institute of Technology who has studied the issue closely.A Polarizing Issue
The revelations could play into the hands of opponents of the H-1B program as the political battle over immigration heats up. President George W. Bush and many other lawmakers want comprehensive immigration reform this year, reform that would address both low-skill workers, largely from Mexico and other parts of Latin America, and high-skill workers, many from India and China. Chances of a compromise over the highly contentious matter of low-skilled workers already look slim. The move by Durbin and Grassley may make resolution of issues on the high-skill front equally unlikely.
Until recently, the discussion over high-skill immigration has centered largely on how to bring in more foreign workers adept at such jobs as software development. Technology companies, from Microsoft (MSFT) and Intel (INTC) to Motorola (MOT) and Qualcomm (QCOM), have argued that the U.S. should offer more work visas for noncitizens to improve its competitiveness.
In March, Microsoft co-founder and chairman Bill Gates went to Washington to make the case to Congress. "Simply put: It makes no sense to tell well-trained, highly skilled individuals—many of whom are educated at our top colleges and universities—that the United States does not welcome or value them," he said. "For too many foreign students and professionals, however, our immigration policies send precisely this message."
Many Indian Applicants
Yet evidence on the H-1B visa program paints a contrasting picture. As BusinessWeek first reported in February, Indian outsourcing companies have become by far the most active applicants for H-1B visas. The data, just then released, showed that seven of the top 10 applicants for H-1Bs in fiscal 2006 were Indian outsourcers, led by Infosys and Wipro.
Officials at the U.S. Citizenship & Immigration Services would not disclose which firms actually received the visas, but they said there was no reason to believe that the number awarded differed greatly from the number applied for. They said the visas are awarded on a "first-come, first-served" basis and no preference was given to U.S. companies.
At the time, Wipro officials said they used the visas to enhance the competitiveness of clients, many of whom work in the U.S. Laxman Badiga, the company's chief information officer, said that of its 4,000 employees in the U.S., roughly 2,500 were on H-1B visas. Each year, 1,000 new temporary workers come to the U.S. to develop their skills in serving U.S. clients, while 1,000 rotate home. Wipro says the training allows the firm to more effectively help its clients. "Our goal is to make our customers more competitive," said Badiga in February. A Wipro spokesman did not provide an official to comment for this story.Taking a "Hard Look"
Just how much the program advances U.S. competitiveness will come under closer scrutiny now. Durbin and Grassley have taken a much harder-edged approach to high-skill immigration than their parties have in the past. The senators say they want to ensure temporary worker programs can't be used to take advantage of American workers. "Considering the high amount of fraud and abuse in the visa program, we need to take a good, hard look at the employers who are using H-1B visas and how they are using them," says Grassley.
The letters probe a number of areas, including whether workers brought into the U.S. on H-1B visas are paid less that comparable American workers, a disparity that could drive down overall wages. The senators ask whether the visas are being used to train people in jobs that will later be moved back to India or other countries. And they request data on American workers who may have been laid off as H-1B workers have been hired.
"We are concerned that the program is not being used as Congress intended," wrote Durbin and Grassley in a letter to Nandan Nilekani, the chief executive of Infosys. Infosys did not return phone calls seeking comment.
Law Limitations
Durbin and Grassley have introduced legislation that make a number of changes in the temporary worker programs. The most radical change would be a requirment that companies applying for the visas attempt to hire U.S. workers first. Currently, applicants need to pledge to pay the prevailing wage, but they don't need to make any effort to hire Americans. The legislation would also require companies to pay higher wages to temporary workers and tighten oversight of the visa programs.
But resolving differences over the program won't be easy. It's not as simple as making the H-1B program more restrictive. U.S. tech companies have struggled to bring in enough workers to fill jobs in specialized fields. Even if foreign outsourcers are stopped from using the visas, there will continue to be shortages. This year, the 65,000 annual cap for H-1Bs was filled in less than two days.
Nor is there an easy distinction between U.S. and non-U.S. firms. While Durbin and Grassley's investigation is focused on Indian outsourcing firms, U.S. companies may very well be using the visas for much the same thing. Among the most active applicants for H-1B visas are Accenture (ACN) and Cognizant Technology Solutions (CTSH). Both are officially headquartered in the U.S., but they have extensive outsourcing operations in India.
Critics say outsourcing firms, including Infosys Technologies (INFY) and Wipro (WIT), are using the visas to replace U.S. employees with foreign workers, often cycling overseas staff through U.S. training programs before sending them back into jobs at home. The lawmakers are intent on probing whether those allegations are accurate. "Supporters claim the goal of the H-1B program is to help the American economy by allowing U.S. companies to hire needed foreign workers," Durbin said in a statement. "The reality is that too many H-1B visas are being used to facilitate the outsourcing of American jobs to other countries."
In outlining the investigation, Durbin and Grassley are making details of the visa program public for the first time, including the number of visas awarded to non-U.S. companies. The nine firms, led by Infosys and Wipro, use 19,512 of the H-1B visas, or 30% of the 65,000 visas allowed each year. This indicates that Indian outsourcing companies participate more actively than previously thought, garnering for themselves visas that could otherwise go to U.S. firms. "This is information that we never had before," says Ron Hira, a public policy professor at the Rochester Institute of Technology who has studied the issue closely.A Polarizing Issue
The revelations could play into the hands of opponents of the H-1B program as the political battle over immigration heats up. President George W. Bush and many other lawmakers want comprehensive immigration reform this year, reform that would address both low-skill workers, largely from Mexico and other parts of Latin America, and high-skill workers, many from India and China. Chances of a compromise over the highly contentious matter of low-skilled workers already look slim. The move by Durbin and Grassley may make resolution of issues on the high-skill front equally unlikely.
Until recently, the discussion over high-skill immigration has centered largely on how to bring in more foreign workers adept at such jobs as software development. Technology companies, from Microsoft (MSFT) and Intel (INTC) to Motorola (MOT) and Qualcomm (QCOM), have argued that the U.S. should offer more work visas for noncitizens to improve its competitiveness.
In March, Microsoft co-founder and chairman Bill Gates went to Washington to make the case to Congress. "Simply put: It makes no sense to tell well-trained, highly skilled individuals—many of whom are educated at our top colleges and universities—that the United States does not welcome or value them," he said. "For too many foreign students and professionals, however, our immigration policies send precisely this message."
Many Indian Applicants
Yet evidence on the H-1B visa program paints a contrasting picture. As BusinessWeek first reported in February, Indian outsourcing companies have become by far the most active applicants for H-1B visas. The data, just then released, showed that seven of the top 10 applicants for H-1Bs in fiscal 2006 were Indian outsourcers, led by Infosys and Wipro.
Officials at the U.S. Citizenship & Immigration Services would not disclose which firms actually received the visas, but they said there was no reason to believe that the number awarded differed greatly from the number applied for. They said the visas are awarded on a "first-come, first-served" basis and no preference was given to U.S. companies.
At the time, Wipro officials said they used the visas to enhance the competitiveness of clients, many of whom work in the U.S. Laxman Badiga, the company's chief information officer, said that of its 4,000 employees in the U.S., roughly 2,500 were on H-1B visas. Each year, 1,000 new temporary workers come to the U.S. to develop their skills in serving U.S. clients, while 1,000 rotate home. Wipro says the training allows the firm to more effectively help its clients. "Our goal is to make our customers more competitive," said Badiga in February. A Wipro spokesman did not provide an official to comment for this story.Taking a "Hard Look"
Just how much the program advances U.S. competitiveness will come under closer scrutiny now. Durbin and Grassley have taken a much harder-edged approach to high-skill immigration than their parties have in the past. The senators say they want to ensure temporary worker programs can't be used to take advantage of American workers. "Considering the high amount of fraud and abuse in the visa program, we need to take a good, hard look at the employers who are using H-1B visas and how they are using them," says Grassley.
The letters probe a number of areas, including whether workers brought into the U.S. on H-1B visas are paid less that comparable American workers, a disparity that could drive down overall wages. The senators ask whether the visas are being used to train people in jobs that will later be moved back to India or other countries. And they request data on American workers who may have been laid off as H-1B workers have been hired.
"We are concerned that the program is not being used as Congress intended," wrote Durbin and Grassley in a letter to Nandan Nilekani, the chief executive of Infosys. Infosys did not return phone calls seeking comment.
Law Limitations
Durbin and Grassley have introduced legislation that make a number of changes in the temporary worker programs. The most radical change would be a requirment that companies applying for the visas attempt to hire U.S. workers first. Currently, applicants need to pledge to pay the prevailing wage, but they don't need to make any effort to hire Americans. The legislation would also require companies to pay higher wages to temporary workers and tighten oversight of the visa programs.
But resolving differences over the program won't be easy. It's not as simple as making the H-1B program more restrictive. U.S. tech companies have struggled to bring in enough workers to fill jobs in specialized fields. Even if foreign outsourcers are stopped from using the visas, there will continue to be shortages. This year, the 65,000 annual cap for H-1Bs was filled in less than two days.
Nor is there an easy distinction between U.S. and non-U.S. firms. While Durbin and Grassley's investigation is focused on Indian outsourcing firms, U.S. companies may very well be using the visas for much the same thing. Among the most active applicants for H-1B visas are Accenture (ACN) and Cognizant Technology Solutions (CTSH). Both are officially headquartered in the U.S., but they have extensive outsourcing operations in India.
Top 20 Users of L Visas in US
L visas allow employees to enter the United States temporarily for work. Here is a look at the top 20 companies that used these visas in the federal government's fiscal year 2006.Company name links to more info Visas granted
1 TATA CONSULTANCY SERVICES LIMITED 4887
2 COGNIZANT TECH SOLUTIONS 3520
3 IBM CORP. 1237
4 SATYAM COMPUTER SERVICES 950
5 WIPRO LTD 839
6 HCL AMERICA INC 511
7 DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP/ DELOITTE CONSULTING LLP 512
8 PATNI COMPUTER SYSTEMS INC 440
9 INTEL CORP. 394
10 KANBAY INC. 329
11 HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL 320
12 HEWLETT-PACKARD 316
13 INFOSYS TECHNOLOGIES 294
14 ACCENTURE LLP 291
15 CARITOR INC 231
16 SCHLUMBERGER TECHNOLOGY CORP 214
17 ORACLE 176
18 SYNTEL LTD 171
19 PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS 168
20 MICROSOFT CORP. 168
1 TATA CONSULTANCY SERVICES LIMITED 4887
2 COGNIZANT TECH SOLUTIONS 3520
3 IBM CORP. 1237
4 SATYAM COMPUTER SERVICES 950
5 WIPRO LTD 839
6 HCL AMERICA INC 511
7 DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP/ DELOITTE CONSULTING LLP 512
8 PATNI COMPUTER SYSTEMS INC 440
9 INTEL CORP. 394
10 KANBAY INC. 329
11 HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL 320
12 HEWLETT-PACKARD 316
13 INFOSYS TECHNOLOGIES 294
14 ACCENTURE LLP 291
15 CARITOR INC 231
16 SCHLUMBERGER TECHNOLOGY CORP 214
17 ORACLE 176
18 SYNTEL LTD 171
19 PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS 168
20 MICROSOFT CORP. 168
Tuesday, June 05, 2007
Swell waves attack again
Swell waves created panic in several parts of Alappuzha and Kollam districts on Monday as strong waves caused widespread damage to houses along the coastal area. The Arattupuzha-Valiyazheekkal Beach Road was damaged due to the attack by strong waves, and traffic had to be stopped on this route.
The swell wave attack was intense also in areas like Thanni, Eravipuram and Azheekkal. In Ervaipuram, six houses were destroyed totally and more than 20 houses suffered partial damages. Sea erosion was intense also in Paravur and Kakkathoppe and Kaleekkal near Chavara.
Tharayikkadavu in Arattupuzha, Amaballpuzha and Punnapra also suffered sea erosion. In these areas, scores of coconut trees on the beach were uprooted due to strong waves.
The swell wave attack was intense also in areas like Thanni, Eravipuram and Azheekkal. In Ervaipuram, six houses were destroyed totally and more than 20 houses suffered partial damages. Sea erosion was intense also in Paravur and Kakkathoppe and Kaleekkal near Chavara.
Tharayikkadavu in Arattupuzha, Amaballpuzha and Punnapra also suffered sea erosion. In these areas, scores of coconut trees on the beach were uprooted due to strong waves.
Global terror groups off Kerala coastline
Central intelligence agencies have warned the Kerala Government and the State intelligence unit about the reported smuggling of narcotic substances like hashish and ganja through the State with the help of Maoists in Andhra Pradesh and the LTTE.
Recently, an abandoned sack was found in a railway station in Alappuzha district that had led to a police investigation, and according to sources, the police were not able to crack the case. After newspaper reports and inputs from the State intelligence, the Central intelligence agencies had conducted a detailed inquiry into the same and had come to some startling conclusions.
According to the warning from Central intelligence agencies, banned drugs are being cultivated in the forests of Andhra Pradesh with the support of Maoists operating actively there. Once the plants are ripe the drugs are extracted and are transported to Kerala, which presently serves as the hub for the transfer of these drugs to international destinations. The help of the LTTE, which has a sizeable wing operating in the seas, is sought for the international transfer of these drugs.
As per Top intelligence sources , "The cadre of LTTE, which has specific interests along the Kerala coast line, are the major transporters and conduit in the transfer of these drugs. This is seen as a source purely for the sake of generating funds."
Sources also said that once these contraband drugs reached foreign shores their value would multiply and sometimes these fetched a hundred-fold more than what it fetched within India .
The Central intelligence agencies have already informed the State intelligence machinery about the need to act fast and efficiently to counter this threat from an international organisation ganging up with other groups with terror leanings within the country.
Intelligence personnel are also worried about the presence of LTTE on the shores of Kerala. The recent capturing of some Tamil Nadu-based fishermen and a Kerala boat driver by the LTTE has already become a cause for worry for the intelligence agencies.
The agencies are of the opinion that organisations like the LTTE, when they get a foothold, will try to convert that route for conducting further operations within the country.
Kerala with its booming economy and the presence of several players in the emerging market is turning into a destination for the terror groups which could harm the socio-political scenario of the State, sources worry.
A senior police officer, however, said, "There is not much to worry about this disclosure from intelligence agencies. It is their duty to report but the State police has already taken some important measures regarding the same, the contents of which cannot be disclosed to the media."
There were also unconfirmed reports that LTTE activities are going on in certain camps run by the migrant labours from Tamil Nadu. Intelligence sources revealed that most of the antecedents of those staying in such camps had not been properly ascertained.
Recently, an abandoned sack was found in a railway station in Alappuzha district that had led to a police investigation, and according to sources, the police were not able to crack the case. After newspaper reports and inputs from the State intelligence, the Central intelligence agencies had conducted a detailed inquiry into the same and had come to some startling conclusions.
According to the warning from Central intelligence agencies, banned drugs are being cultivated in the forests of Andhra Pradesh with the support of Maoists operating actively there. Once the plants are ripe the drugs are extracted and are transported to Kerala, which presently serves as the hub for the transfer of these drugs to international destinations. The help of the LTTE, which has a sizeable wing operating in the seas, is sought for the international transfer of these drugs.
As per Top intelligence sources , "The cadre of LTTE, which has specific interests along the Kerala coast line, are the major transporters and conduit in the transfer of these drugs. This is seen as a source purely for the sake of generating funds."
Sources also said that once these contraband drugs reached foreign shores their value would multiply and sometimes these fetched a hundred-fold more than what it fetched within India .
The Central intelligence agencies have already informed the State intelligence machinery about the need to act fast and efficiently to counter this threat from an international organisation ganging up with other groups with terror leanings within the country.
Intelligence personnel are also worried about the presence of LTTE on the shores of Kerala. The recent capturing of some Tamil Nadu-based fishermen and a Kerala boat driver by the LTTE has already become a cause for worry for the intelligence agencies.
The agencies are of the opinion that organisations like the LTTE, when they get a foothold, will try to convert that route for conducting further operations within the country.
Kerala with its booming economy and the presence of several players in the emerging market is turning into a destination for the terror groups which could harm the socio-political scenario of the State, sources worry.
A senior police officer, however, said, "There is not much to worry about this disclosure from intelligence agencies. It is their duty to report but the State police has already taken some important measures regarding the same, the contents of which cannot be disclosed to the media."
There were also unconfirmed reports that LTTE activities are going on in certain camps run by the migrant labours from Tamil Nadu. Intelligence sources revealed that most of the antecedents of those staying in such camps had not been properly ascertained.
Monday, June 04, 2007
Guruvayoor Temple Tantri speaks out
There is no negation of the Temple Entry Proclamation of 1936 in the performance of the Punyaham ritual after the entry of Ravi Krishna, son of Union Minister for Overseas Indian Affairs Vayalar Ravi, temple Thantri Chennas Raman Namboothiripad told this website's newspaper.
“As the Thantri of the temple, I am only bound to act upon the existing laws and I am performing the rituals as per the tradition and custom at the temple and I am ready to face prosecution for performing a ritual as per the existing tradition and custom of the temple. It is not the Thantri who escorted Ravi Krishna to the temple.
The Devaswom officals who received Ravi Krishna should have sought the clarification as a Punyaham had been performed earlier after his entry to the temple in 2000.”, the Thantri said.The Punyaham was performed not for the Choroonu ritual or the entry of Vayalar Ravi’s grandchild who is a Hindu maternally, the Thantri clarified.
The Punyaham was performed because of entry of Ravi Krishna, who is a Christian maternally.Ravi Krishna should have produced some relevant documents to prove that he is a Hindu prior to the entry in to the temple since he faced the purification ritual 7 years ago, Thantri said.“When Ravi Krishna’s entry was brought to my notice I can only direct for a purification ritual and nothing else”, Thantri said.
The Devaswom Minister who showers abusing words on everyone, should spare me.The words used by the Devaswom Minister to abuse me are painful and as the Thantri of Sree Guruvayurappan, I cannot give a reply to the minister in same language, Chennas Raman Namboothiripad said.“Thantri cannot legislate new laws for the temple and if Sudhkaran has the guts to initiate the law enabling all the non-Hindus to enter the temples in the state, let him do it.
If a law is legislated, then like every citizen, the Thantri too is bound to obey the law and it can be followed at the temple. Till then spare the Thantri of Guruvayur temple”, Chennas Raman Namboothiripad said.
“As the Thantri of the temple, I am only bound to act upon the existing laws and I am performing the rituals as per the tradition and custom at the temple and I am ready to face prosecution for performing a ritual as per the existing tradition and custom of the temple. It is not the Thantri who escorted Ravi Krishna to the temple.
The Devaswom officals who received Ravi Krishna should have sought the clarification as a Punyaham had been performed earlier after his entry to the temple in 2000.”, the Thantri said.The Punyaham was performed not for the Choroonu ritual or the entry of Vayalar Ravi’s grandchild who is a Hindu maternally, the Thantri clarified.
The Punyaham was performed because of entry of Ravi Krishna, who is a Christian maternally.Ravi Krishna should have produced some relevant documents to prove that he is a Hindu prior to the entry in to the temple since he faced the purification ritual 7 years ago, Thantri said.“When Ravi Krishna’s entry was brought to my notice I can only direct for a purification ritual and nothing else”, Thantri said.
The Devaswom Minister who showers abusing words on everyone, should spare me.The words used by the Devaswom Minister to abuse me are painful and as the Thantri of Sree Guruvayurappan, I cannot give a reply to the minister in same language, Chennas Raman Namboothiripad said.“Thantri cannot legislate new laws for the temple and if Sudhkaran has the guts to initiate the law enabling all the non-Hindus to enter the temples in the state, let him do it.
If a law is legislated, then like every citizen, the Thantri too is bound to obey the law and it can be followed at the temple. Till then spare the Thantri of Guruvayur temple”, Chennas Raman Namboothiripad said.
Church leaders begin to feel eviction heat
With the Special Task Force, which was constituted by Chief Minister VS Achuthanandan for retrieving Government lands grabbed by encroachers, not sparing even the ruling front coalition partners, a section of the Christian church is feeling the heat.
Special Task Force chief K Suresh Kumar met the Chief Minister to have some final discussions on the methods to be adopted to raze down the Church buildings constructed in grabbed Government land, sources said.
According to sources, the action against the church has something to do with the issue of the self-financing professional colleges.
Highly placed sources in the Government told The Pioneer that a powerful bishop based in Idukki district has been camping at Thiruvananthapuram for the past couple of days to prevent Government action. It is learnt that this priest had told the officers and some senior LDF leaders that there were schools constructed in the Revenue land and as schools were reopening on Monday it would create problems for the children.
Sources in the Government told The Pioneer that neither the Chief Minister nor the senior officers attached with the Special Task Force had given an audience to the bishop. A section of the CPI (M) leadership is, however, batting for the bishop.
A senior official with the State Government while speaking to The Pioneer said, "The bishop and his entourage are using all their means for an audience with the Chief Minister, but he has in clear terms informed the church leaders that he will not be available for any meeting on this issue."
The section of the Kerala Congress, which is part of the LDF, is also trying to put in some pressure on Achuthanandan for a meeting with the bishop but, according to information available, this has not yielded any result.
The Christian congregation, which has several educational institutions and hospitals, has constructed 57 churches in Government land and there are either educational institutions or hospitals attached with these churches to give them a colour of social service. The special task force and its team of officers are in the final stages of calculating the exact area of the Revenue land grabbed by this congregation.
The special task force has also given signals to the Chief Minister on the legality of the land of an engineering college in central Travancore managed and run by a church. A senior police officer, who has worked in central Travancore area, told The Pioneer, "The land-grab by this congregation is not a new phenomenon. We have given clear reports to the Government on the same but there has been no action. This Chief Minister is serious on his promises."
It is also learnt that in the ongoing discussions between the Government and the self-financing managements regarding admission in professional courses, the land-grabbing issue has come to the fore. There are indications that certain church groups had even considered the proposal from the Government side in engineering and medical admissions provided there are no further action into land-grabbing.
This is a clear pointer that there is something to hide on the part of these land-grabbers and whether the Government will bite the bait or go ahead with the demolition drive is to be seen in the days to come.
Special Task Force chief K Suresh Kumar met the Chief Minister to have some final discussions on the methods to be adopted to raze down the Church buildings constructed in grabbed Government land, sources said.
According to sources, the action against the church has something to do with the issue of the self-financing professional colleges.
Highly placed sources in the Government told The Pioneer that a powerful bishop based in Idukki district has been camping at Thiruvananthapuram for the past couple of days to prevent Government action. It is learnt that this priest had told the officers and some senior LDF leaders that there were schools constructed in the Revenue land and as schools were reopening on Monday it would create problems for the children.
Sources in the Government told The Pioneer that neither the Chief Minister nor the senior officers attached with the Special Task Force had given an audience to the bishop. A section of the CPI (M) leadership is, however, batting for the bishop.
A senior official with the State Government while speaking to The Pioneer said, "The bishop and his entourage are using all their means for an audience with the Chief Minister, but he has in clear terms informed the church leaders that he will not be available for any meeting on this issue."
The section of the Kerala Congress, which is part of the LDF, is also trying to put in some pressure on Achuthanandan for a meeting with the bishop but, according to information available, this has not yielded any result.
The Christian congregation, which has several educational institutions and hospitals, has constructed 57 churches in Government land and there are either educational institutions or hospitals attached with these churches to give them a colour of social service. The special task force and its team of officers are in the final stages of calculating the exact area of the Revenue land grabbed by this congregation.
The special task force has also given signals to the Chief Minister on the legality of the land of an engineering college in central Travancore managed and run by a church. A senior police officer, who has worked in central Travancore area, told The Pioneer, "The land-grab by this congregation is not a new phenomenon. We have given clear reports to the Government on the same but there has been no action. This Chief Minister is serious on his promises."
It is also learnt that in the ongoing discussions between the Government and the self-financing managements regarding admission in professional courses, the land-grabbing issue has come to the fore. There are indications that certain church groups had even considered the proposal from the Government side in engineering and medical admissions provided there are no further action into land-grabbing.
This is a clear pointer that there is something to hide on the part of these land-grabbers and whether the Government will bite the bait or go ahead with the demolition drive is to be seen in the days to come.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)